Joey Umadac and you will Claire Bingayen was basically scheduled so you’re able to from the Sta

RONULO Versus. People

FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Chapel from San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Yet not, on the day of the relationships, new heading officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, refused to solemnize the marriage upon discovering the pair hit a brick wall to safe a marriage licenses. While the an excellent recourse, Joey, who had been after that wearing barong tagalong, and you may Claire, clad into the a marriage outfit, along with their mothers, sponsors and you may guests, continued for the Independent Chapel off Filipino Christians, also known as brand new Aglipayan Church. It requested the fresh petitioner, a keen Aglipayan priest, to execute a ceremony to which the latter arranged despite having started informed by the couple they had no wedding certification.

The fresh petitioner waiting their choir and planned a size to your couple for a passing fancy day. He presented the latest ceremony on the visibility of one’s groom, the latest bride-to-be, the moms and dads, the main and you can secondary sponsors plus the rest of its allowed traffic.

The new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you may Mary Anne Yere, testified into situations of your own ceremony. Joseph is actually the newest veil recruit if you’re Mary Anne are this new cord mentor on matrimony. Mary Anne testified one to she spotted new bride-to-be walk-down new aisle. She including spotted the happy couple change the marriage rings, kiss one another, and you may sign a document. She read the petitioner instructing the primary sponsors to help you sign the marriage price. Thereafter, it went to the fresh lobby, got food and you may got photographs. She saw the petitioner indeed there. She in addition to understood the marriage invite given to their by Joey.

Fl Umadac, the caretaker out of Joey, testified that she heard the happy couple declare inside the ceremony one it just take both because the wife and husband. Mariano Roentgen. Nalupta Jr. where she gotten a certificate that zero marriage licenses is issued on the pair.

Brand new petitioner, while you are admitting which he presented a service, rejected you to his operate out of blessing the couple is actually tantamount to an excellent solemnization of your relationships just like the considered legally.

ISSUE: Acquired the new petitioner is responsible for violating Post https://datingranking.net/australia-elite-dating 352 of Revised Penal Code (RPC) to have presumably doing an unlawful wedding ceremony.

Months adopting the wedding, she went to this new municipal local municipal registrar regarding San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte with Atty

RATIO: Petitioner held an unlawful wedding party. The latest offense once the sent to within the Ways 352 of RPC refers to the show from ily Password and this reads:

(3) A married relationship ceremony that takes set to the look of the latest hiring functions before the solemnizing manager as well as their personal declaration you to definitely it bring one another while the husband and wife on visibility off for around several witnesses regarding court age.

Art. six. Zero prescribed form or religious rite on solemnization of your own relationships required. They shall be expected, however, towards the hiring events to appear really before the solemnizing manager and you may state in the visibility off not less than a few witnesses of court many years which they grab each other because the partner and you may wife. This statement are going to be part of the matrimony certification and this should end up being closed by employing people as well as their witnesses and you may attested because of the solemnizing manager.

Brand new Finest Legal explained that what produced the brand new petitioner’s operate a great wedding service and not only a mere true blessing was one while there is no recommended mode otherwise religious rite, all that was expected is actually “with the contracting parties to look actually before the solemnizing administrator and you may claim on the exposure of not less than one or two witnesses out of judge decades that they need each other as the partner and you may girlfriend.”

About what basic requirements, the fresh petitioner acknowledge that parties featured prior to your and therefore reality is testified so you’re able to because of the witnesses. With the 2nd demands, we discover that, resistant to the petitioner’s allegation, the new prosecution seems, from testimony from witnesses, your hiring parties myself declared that they take each other as wife and husband. Thus, it is clear one to petitioner held a wedding ceremony and never a mere blessing.